![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Bully-Busting Basics
Workplace aggression destroys morale,
leads to staff turnover, threatens patient care, and wreaks
financial havoc. Learning to recognize intimidating behaviors
and how to stop them makes sense legally and financially.
For 10 years, Jane had done everything
for the ever-absent Clinical Director, Peter Clark, MD, from
creatively balancing his budget to picking up his children and
his dry cleaning. She opened his mail, screened his calls, and
checked his e-mails. When he announced his plan to hire a
development professional to generate support for the Charity
AIDS Clinic, Jane had hoped she could take on these
responsibilities too.
Instead, Clark hired Sarah,
a nurse turned fund-raiser. Sarah was quiet, independent, had a
strong fund-raising record, and was passionate about the cause.
When writing grants, she kept her office door closed,
especially to Jane, who routinely pumped people for gossip.
Most days, Sarah ate at her desk and used lunch breaks to train
for charity runs. Jane called her “the worm.” One
day Sarah overheard Jane tell colleagues Sarah had an eating
disorder and serious family problems. The next week, Jane
accused her of spreading a computer virus. Jane confiscated
Sarah’s computer and assigned her the spare in the break
room. Jane demanded Sarah’s documents be submitted to her
for final clearance and distribution, declaring it office
policy. When Sarah requested the budget for the Charity
fund-raiser six months away, Jane said she’d get the
numbers if Sarah thought she’d survive that long. Five
months and numerous requests later, Sarah still had no budget
and no computer. Every time Sarah booked a meeting with Dr.
Clark, Jane canceled it. The staff had stopped speaking to
Sarah and no one made eye contact. On the rare occasions when
Dr. Clark breezed into the office, Jane dominated his time.
After one such occasion, Jane told Sarah that Dr. Clark
canceled the fund-raiser.
Six months after she was
hired, Sarah succeeded in getting one message through to Dr.
Clark—her resignation.
Bullying in the
workplace—a.k.a., psycho terror, mobbing, psychological
violence, neuropsychological compromise, can cause irreparable
harm to individuals and pose significant financial burdens for
health-care facilities and institutions. The Workplace Bullying
Institute (WBI) (www.bullyinginstitute.org) calls it the silent
epidemic and defines bullying as “the repeated
mistreatment of one employee targeted by one or more employees
with a malicious mix of humiliation, intimidation, verbal
abuse, and work interference.”
Despite its healing
orientation, the health-care field offers no immunity to
bullying. Gary Namie, PhD, the director of the Workplace
Bullying Institute in Bellingham, Washington, and the co-author
of The Bully at Work (Sourcebooks, 2003) believes bullying is
endemic in the health-care arena.
Physicians may encounter
such abusers of power in any health-care setting. A bully might
be the office manager who is always good for a dose of gossip,
or the head nurse who just lost the
As with other forms of
abuse, victims frequently suffer in silent shame. Human nature
moves coworkers to avoid the troubled target, remain on guard,
and even befriend the bully out of fear of becoming the next
victim. The disorder spreads and the symptoms appear—a
decline in work performance, a rise in absenteeism, rapid staff
turnover, and the departure of the best and brightest, a
prevailing aura of distrust, resentment, and hostility. Pity
the patients who seek care within a facility staffed by
distracted and bullied professionals. Toxicity in the
health-care workplace has the potential to affect patient care
and safety. Recognizing and effectively dealing with workplace
bullying and backing it up with a code of conduct and zero
tolerance for less-than-civil behavior are critical to
preventing human and financial harm that can reach devastating
levels.
A malignancy of power
“It’s all about power,”
says Judith Glaser, the CEO of Benchmark Communications, Inc.,
and author of The DNA of Leadership, (Platinum Press, 2006).
Leaders who abuse their role and cross the line from boss to
bully turn workers into victims, thereby creating a toxic
environment for everyone.
A lot of classic social
psychology experiments like the Lombardo experiment at Stanford
and the Milgram Studies at Yale show that putting people in
positions of power over others can lead them to be surprisingly
cruel, says Ben Dattner, PhD, a professor at New York
University and a principal of Dattner Consulting, LLC, a New
York-based organizational consulting and research firm.
Of course, not everyone who
is entrusted with power is destined to abuse it. “I
wouldn’t say that all narcissists are bullies or that all
bullies are narcissists, but there is certainly some overlap
conceptually between narcissists [and those] who are
exploitative,” says Dattner. “With such
personalities, there is an attitude of entitlement that could
definitely correlate with being a bully.”
While bullying is often
thought of as the bad behavior of bosses, a phenomenon known as
“horizontal violence” is a form of bullying that
occurs among workers on the same level. Despite a dearth of
U.S. statistics, this form of bullying is considered a
significant problem in the nursing profession. (Journal of
Advanced Nursing, 2003).
A bully’s strategies
can range from bold public displays to insidious destructive
acts. “[Bullying behavior] could be screaming, cursing,
spreading vicious rumors, sabotaging people by destroying their
property or their work product. A lot of times, with bosses,
it’s excessive criticism,” says Robin Bond, Esq.,
the managing partner of Transition Strategies, LLC, a workplace
law firm in Wayne, Pennsylvania, who served as a hospital
counsel for 10 years. Bullying behavior can also lead to
hitting, slapping, and shoving.
Bullying that escalates to
physical violence among health-care workers only sounds like
fiction, but in 1993, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
reported health-care and social service workers as having the
highest incidence of occupational assault injuries.
According to WBI, three
main workplace factors set the stage for bullying:
opportunity—often created by a highly competitive
environment; the presence of people willing to exploit others;
and an employer who refuses to punish or one who promotes and
rewards individuals who bully.
The health-care environment
is particularly bully-prone, says Namie. “We get the most
complaints from health care.” A 2002 national survey of
workplace aggression reported 41 percent of workers experience
psychological workplace aggression in a given year. (Handbook
of Workplace Violence, Sage 2006). By comparison, a study of
2,884 medical students representing 16 U.S. medical schools
from the class of 2003, found that 42 percent reported having
experienced harassment and 84 percent experienced belittlement
during med school. (BMJ, September 30, 2006).
Health-care work settings
tend to be fast-paced and attract a distinct mix of
people—a large population of individuals with strong egos
and a willingness to exploit others working alongside a large
population of people who have a pro-social orientation and want
to heal, teach, and help others, says Namie. In addition,
bullying behavior often passes as ambition. Ironically, these
are the very people who get rewarded and promoted and who have
made themselves invaluable to key people. Dattner agrees.
“There’s definitely a dynamic where people kiss up
and kick down,” he says.
In addition, Namie says,
few institutions have an established code of conduct or a
policy against bullying. It’s so prevalent in health care
that employees often think of bullying as an acceptable
occupational hazard. This makes it even more dangerous as
people become immune to the consequences, do not challenge the
manner of conducting business, and become increasingly
suppressed and oppressed.
The WBI describes four
common bullying behavior patterns: the screaming,
fist-pounding individual who cultivates fear; the
friend-to-your-face who stabs in the back; the constant critic;
and the gatekeeper who bars access to materials and
information. Though their styles may differ, “what all
bullies share is that they are Machiavellian,” says
Namie. “They are willing to manipulate other people to
accomplish their own goals. Everything is driven by their
personal agenda.”
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||